|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeMagnifiersTriplet LoupesBausch & Lomb Illuminated Coddington Pocket Magnifier 10x |
|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review: ( 3 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 7 found the following review helpful:
Don't go there Aug 03, 2009
By ez-reader
Pros: Manifier portion is good
Cons: battery holder is flimsy, threaded connection is poorly made, bulb has extremely short life
I have had many fine B&L hand lenses over the years and When I received this magnifier I expected much better, the bulb was defective and I could see that the threaded mating point between the lens and the handle would not stand up to any daily use. A more substantial barrel/handle for the battery case, an improved connection and a longer lived bulb would go along way toward making this a much better product. The idea is great, the execution is not, Bausch and Lomb should be more careful regarding what they attach their name to.
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
Not worth it. Jun 23, 2009
By Frustrated in Minneapolis
BAUSCH & LOMB LIGHTED MAGNIFIER POCKET CODDINGTON 10X
Very disappointed with product. Product description does not properly describe poor optical quality and inferior flashlight construction. Bausch and Lomb makes a 10X inspection loupe of much better quality, but apparently do not offer it in a lighted form. Company was unresponsive when I contacted them.
Poor product with B&L name Mar 02, 2012
By Jedediah Smith
I bought this because I felt reassured by the B&L name. I wish I had come here first to read the reviews. There is only a very small portion in the center of the lense that isn't highly distorted. The finish on parts of the silver body was peeling off. The body is very flimsy. I wanted a portable lighted loupe and thought that quality would be decent compared to lighted magnifiers you typically find in office supply retailers because of the B&L name. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case. This thing is going back.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
